Probability - If You Don't Understand It, It Will Cost You Money

By: Stuart McPhee
Submitted: 2007-01-17 16:16:37
Print this article | Tell a friend | For publisher | Social Bookmarking
Rating:
 

Probability is very relevant to trading, and one of the main things I look for when entering trades for example, is to have a high probability of having a profitable trade. In other words, because all of my conditions have been met, I enter the trade with confidence knowing there is a fair chance of the trade resulting in a profit. As we know, there are never any certainties.

Probability has its place in money management too, specifically position sizing.

Let’s set the scene. Perhaps we have a trading method that results in half of our trades being profits and the other half being losses or close to breakeven. We start with $10000 and after a few losses, our trading capital has lessened to $9400. (3 x $200 losses in successive trades).

Now, we begin to think that we are behind and need to make up the deficit so we can move forward and begin to make money. As each losing trade passes however, the money we need to make to get back to breakeven (back to the initial $10000) increases and we have less and less capital to do it with, which places pressure on us to perform.

The trap we can fall into is to increase our trade size on the back of successive losses. In the back of our mind are desperation, and the thought that we need to have a massive winner trade soon to get back on track.

Here is where probability enters the scene. As each losing trade passes, we can easily think that the chance of the next trade being a profit increases significantly. It is too easy to think this and with this in the back of our mind, we can be tempted to increase our trade size to get back to break even quickly because the chance of the next trade being another loss is not great.

Let’s explain this scenario with some numbers. The probability of an event is generally represented as a real number between 0 and 1, inclusive. An impossible event has a probability of exactly 0, and a certain event has a probability of 1.

As we have a proven method that is profitable in half of the trades, the probability of having a profitable trade is 0.5. The most common analogy used with a probability of 0.5 is that of tossing a coin. When we toss a coin, the probability that it will land heads up on any given coin toss is 0.5 or 50%, and the same of landing tails. So if we toss the coin 10 times, we would expect that the result will be 5 heads and 5 tails. There is however, no guarantee that this will occur. It is possible for example, to result in 10 heads in a row. The key here however, is that each coin toss is independent. In other words, the outcome of the next toss is unaffected by previous coin tosses, as the coin has no memory retention.

Let's assume I am now tossing a coin. We toss the coin once and it result in heads. For the second coin toss, the probability that heads will come up again remains at 0.5. The second toss now results in another head – that’s two heads in a row. For the third toss, the probability that heads will come up again still remains at 0.5. Guess what? The third toss was also a head – that’s three in a row. Do you know what the probability of the fourth coin toss being a head is? It remains the same probability as a tail coming up.

This scenario is applicable in trading.

If you have had 3 losses in a row, the probability that you are going to have a profitable trade doesn’t automatically shift in your favour. Nor does it continue to shift as each losing trading passes. We like to think it does, but it doesn’t. Perhaps we think, “The next trade HAS to be a winner!” Like the coin, the market has no memory retention and doesn’t keep track of your previous trades, in order to influence the outcome of future trades.

The key message here is that don’t increase your trade size according to these unfounded thoughts. This is a sure recipe for disaster. After a few losses, your trade size should be decreased slightly to reflect your diminished trading capital, even though you don't want to.

Stuart McPhee is recognized as a leading trading coach and expert when it comes to developing solid and profitable trading plans.

Discover what most traders never realise which leads to their downfall. Learn about the importance of having the right trading mindset, sound money management and a solid method - The 3 Ms! Click Here ==> http://www.trading-plan.com

Receive Stuart’s free trading tips by signing up for his ezine at: ==> http://www.trading-plan.com/ezine_registration.html

Article source: Expert Articles

Most Recent Articles in Stocks Mutual Funds category

  • Where to Put a Stop Loss - By: Dr. Winton Felt
    Whether you use volatility-based, Fibonacci. Gann, percentage declines, pivot points, or any other method for determining where to put a stop loss, your stop loss will sometimes be triggered just before the stock resumes its climb. Learn to live with it. The alternative can be disastrous.
  • Select Stocks by Combining Technical and Fundamental Screens - By: Dr. Winton Felt
    A stock selection strategy designed to find stocks that are likely to appreciate significantly within a relatively short time should include both fundamental and technical screening systems. The technical is useful for identifying setups and in the timing of purchases and sales. Good fundamentals are the fuel that enable sustained flight.
  • Be Both a Short-Term Trader and a Long-Term Investor - By: Dr. Winton Felt
    Short-term traders often assume less risk than long-term investors. There is a right time and a wrong time to own the stock of every great company. The smartest investors base their decisions on the balance between risk and reward, not on a pre-determined holding period.
  • Short-Term Stock Trends and Risk Control - By: Dr. Winton Felt
    Risk control is more important than being a long-term investor. Stock trends are becoming shorter. Risk is increasing. Riding out all dips in stock price can lead to disaster.
  • The Advantage of Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) - By: Dr. Winton Felt
    In general, ETFs are less volatile than individual stocks, have many of the benefits of sector and index mutual funds, and a relatively low expense ratio. Fraud, as has occurred with standard mutual funds, is virtually impossible. They are worth considering as alternatives to individual stocks and standard mutual funds.
  • Stock Market Investing: Long-Term or Short-Term? - By: Dr. Winton Felt
    To buy and hold stocks for the long-term has been the preferred approach to stock market investing for many decades. However, in a volatile stock market this approach can be very expensive in terms of risk vs. return on investment. The long-term holder may not be taking the wisest course after all.
  • The Fundamental vs. the Technical in Stock Buy and Sell Decisions - By: Dr. Winton Felt
    In a volatile market, technical signals tend to precede announcements of change in the fundamentals of a company. Understand how this works and how to use both the technical and the fundamental in your buy and sell decisions.
  • What does "Timing the Market" or "Market Timing" Really Mean? - By: Dr. Winton Felt
    As practiced by professionals, "market timing" is about buying and selling in accordance with a predetermined set of conditions and rules. It is about following the buy signals and the sell signals. It is not about investing according to how one "feels" about the market, and it is not about the illegal activities of some mutual fund managers that the media has referred to as "market timing."
  • The Best Stop Loss for Long-Term Investors - By: Dr. Winton Felt
    Wherever the stop loss is placed, there is the chance that the stock will reverse course after the stop loss is triggered. We wondered if there was an optimum stop loss placement that would minimize both the loss allowed by the stop loss and the probability of a reversal after the sale.
  • Diversification and Stop Loss Placement - By: Dr. Winton Felt
    Some of the most respected names in the investment world (Granville, Weinstein, Dines, Magee, Zweig, Sperandeo, Schwager, O'Neil, Murphy, and others all agree on the necessity of using stop losses. Though they do not seem to agree on how much of a stock decline to allow selling, they are much closer in their thinking than is apparent on the surface.