Categories
- Arts & Entertainment
- Business
- Communications
- Computers
- Culture & Society
- Disease & Illness
- Fashion
- Finance
- Food & Beverage
- Health & Fitness
- Hobbies
- Home & Family
- Home Based Business
- Internet Business
- Legal
- Pets & Animals
- Politics
- Product Reviews
- Recreation & Sports
- Reference & Education
- Religion
- Self Improvement
- Shopping
- Travel & Leisure
- Vehicles
- Writing & Speaking
Information
Naming Them
Submitted: 2007-01-17 16:24:14
Print this article | Tell a friend | For publisher |
I kept my name when I married in 1995. I never expected that a choice about so small a matter would cause much commotion, and it didn’t, not much. I did have a couple of people ask me if I respected marriage (yes, so much so that I wish it were an option available to all my friends), my husband (sometimes), etc. and I did experience the obligatory chilliness about it from certain conservative relations. I also got some trouble from the phone company about our listing. On the whole, though, keeping my own last name did not seem like a very big deal.
Then my daughter was born.
As we awaited her arrival, my husband and I considered many possibilities when it came to a last name for our daughter. We had a name agreement that involved me naming all girls and him naming all boys, so the choice was mine, but I wanted us both to be happy with that choice. A part of me does think that patrilineage is a patently stupid custom. Even if it were not for the sexism inherent in such a practice, it seems like a mighty uncertain way to track a family tree. When a baby is born, everyone knows who gave birth to it - paternity is often not so cut and dried. Still, it is not as if some of the reason for giving children their fathers’ names was not due to that very concern - to protect a child’s claim on a man and what he could provide for the child. And it was not like I wasn’t well aware that such issues could still hold relevance in my child’s life at some point in the future, so I was not entirely sure that I wanted to turn my back on that little evolutionary nudge. I wasn’t sure that I didn’t want to, either, though. My husband and I definitely considered the option of a hyphenated last name, both of our names, but the hyphenated last name option really only makes sense until you start thinking about when the hyphenated child has children. If little Boone-Thomas wants to reproduce with Mussey-Hitt someday…well, what about their children? It gets crazy pretty fast. There are plenty of other options to consider and we considered many of them, but, in the end, I just gave her my husband’s last name. It seemed like the easiest thing at the time and I had a lot of other things with which to occupy my mental energy.
As time went by, however, I was aware that the choice I had made did not always sit well with me. I expected and did not mind when my child’s friends called me Mrs. Thomas, and was pleasantly surprised when the staff at her school never did so, but I did mind some things. I minded very much that my daughter’s pediatrician’s office wanted to put her father’s name in the charts as the responsible party even though her health insurance was and always had been carried through my job. I minded as my child got older and started asking why I did not give her my last name instead.
At some point, when looking for good feminist media for my young daughter, I came across New Moon Magazine and noticed that the parents who had founded it had given one of their daughters her father’s last name and one of them her mother’s last name. I liked that. Before long, a family with two children joined our Quaker Meeting. One child had her mother’s last name and one child had his father’s last name. I was sold. I gave birth to my second daughter in 2004 and gave her my last name. I probably would have chickened out of my plan if she had been a boy because my husband had a venerable old family name chosen in case of a boy-baby and it seemed a little sad to me not to be able to give him the whole name. We had a girl, though, a wonderful girl. Her birth and naming made our system seem fair to me: one child with his name and one with mine.
Not everyone felt that way. My older daughter was not entirely thrilled at not having the same name as her sister, although she wanted to change her name, not the other way around; she’s a fan of matrilineage, it seems. My mother, not generally an old-fashioned type, was appalled. She thought it was just wrong for the sisters to have different last names which seemed a little odd to me because I always had a different last name from my siblings with whom I grew up – my father’s name. My siblings were the children of my mom and my step dad and had his name. Quite a few people mentioned this angle…that people would think they were “half sisters”. As a “half sister” myself, I have always found the label ugly and thought little of people’s need to make distinctions. Our daughters were our daughters. The fact that they are “whole sisters” confers only the status of being more likely organ donors for each other if they ever, God forbid, need a transplant of any kind.
The baby is still young, so our naming choices may cause stumbling blocks that I have not yet foreseen, but I am really happy with our names now. I put both of our last names on correspondence that is from the whole family and I feel like Boone is an equal party, not just some afterthought. I feel equal in our family. Names and labels are far from the most important things we have to struggle over, but they are still important. Names can tell us what we value, and it is important that we value each of us.
(this article first appeared in off our backs: the feminist news journal)
Mariah Boone is a mother, writer, social worker, Texas historian and the publisher of Lone Star Ma: The Magazine of Progressive Texas Parenting and Children's Issues. To read more, go to http://www.LoneStarMa.com.
Article source: Expert Articles
Most Recent Articles in Politics category
- A Race Hanging By a Thread - By: Bobby Miller s
I have never spoken a kind word about the Israelis in my life, but it's simply impossible to deal with these hate-consumed Arabs. - The Politics of a Great Headline - By: Colleen Davis
Election time is just around the corner and candidate's are out in full force pushing their campaigns with posters and signs on every other corner. Add this to the regular influx of ads hitting the streets every week - President Searching With a Fine Tooth Comb - By: Ajeet Khurana
The US Presidential elections are due in 2008. Intelligent voters always weigh their options before choosing someone as President. - The Insurgency in Southern Thailand - By: Matt Crook
Thai premier Surayud Chulanont has reacted to escalating violence in Thailand’s southernmost regions by traveling to the area and making his latest move towards ending decades of violence.The insurgency in southern Thailand has received major media attention in the wake of a series of violent incidents centered in the three southern provinces of Yala, Pattani and Narathiwat.The history of this separatist movement can be traced back to the early twentieth century when in 1902 Patani was annexed by Thailand (then known as Siam). - John Kerry, Republicans, & Our Military: So Irate Together - By: Stephen Oakes
What do John Kerry, Republicans, and now the U.S. military have in common? - Fighting Dem's, Hiding Dem's, and All Things in Between - By: Greg Reeson
The latest television campaign ad in the Virginia Senate race features two of the primary election approaches engineered by Democratic strategists for this November's mid-term contest: attacking the President's judgment and competence and appealing to the patriotism and dedication to service of current and former military members. These two campaign tactics, along with a third, newer strategy that just emerged in recent weeks, form the core of Howard Dean's plan for winning back the House and Senate after twelve years of Republican control.The first part of the campaign strategy centers on attacking the Republican candidate, Senator George Allen, by framing him as "guilty through association" for his support of the President and his policies. - American Government's Chief Cornerstone and Indissoluble Bond - By: Paul Davis
Our Founding Fathers pledged their lives, fortunes and sacred honor for the freedoms we now possess and so casually take for granted.Samuel Adams, the Father of the American Revolution, the patriot and leader who brought about our famous saying, “No taxation without representation” he said:“The right to freedom being the gift of the Almighty… The rights of the colonists as Christians…may be best understood by reading and carefully studying the institution of The Great Law Giver and Head of the Christian Church, which are to be found clearly written and promulgated in the New Testament.”On September 6, 1774, the second day of he Continental Congress, Samuel Adams proposed that one session be opened with prayer. - Will Europe Go Left Or Right - By: Eric Sutherland
With Merkal in West Germany being pragmatic by pushing through benefit reforms and the big German companies pushing the unions to agree new conditions in exchange for jobs to remain in Germany and respond to Globalisation by moving production to low cost Eastern European or Asian countries. These conditions covered both working practices and redundancy benefits payable. In Germany it appears to be working, with the increase in output and the only country in socialist Europe. - New Era in the UN - By: Ziv Maor
Does the appointment of Ban Ki-moon as UN Secretary General bode well for UN-US relations? What challenges does Ki-moon face? A quick sketch of the pre-eminent diplomat On September 13 2006, the UN Security Council approved the appointment of Ban Ki-moon as the next UN Secretary General. - Creating Righteous U.S. Government - By: Ed Howes
In truth, I am more than a little surprised nuclear regime change has not yet happened in America. Whatever has prevented it is certainly not the Department of Homeland Security. Far more likely millions of sincere prayers for mercy on these miserable offenders have delayed what may be inevitable.
