Skeptics On The Run: Overcoming the Agnostic Thesis

By: Carson C. Day
Submitted: 2007-01-17 11:22:49
Print this article | Tell a friend | For publisher | Social Bookmarking
Rating:
 

Back in the day, I used to host a radio talk-show in Santa Rosa, CA called "Point of Contention." I had a great time fielding the whole range of calls you might imagine a host would reap on a show treating religious and philosophical topics. One of the more interesting refrains I encountered behind the microphone would run something like this: "You Christians all seem so confident that your version of "the Truth" really tells it like it is, and yet not only do you not agree with each other half the time, but you dismiss out-of-hand dozens of other views that scholarly types take seriously. With all the different views out there it seems highly unlikely that you -- out of all the contenders -- just happened to get it right."

Sometimes, this challenge comes in a more abbreviated form like, "I suppose you think all YOUR views are right." Now let us treat these in reverse order. I always find the short version the most fascinating. Look at it carefully and you will notice that it comprises a tautology -- a claim that is true by definition. Whatever happen to constitute "my views" (by definition) I believe to be true. But the same is true of everyone else. "Your views" simply shortens the phrase "views you believe to be true."

Believe it or not, this caller seemed to suggest -- by implication and without realizing it -- that I ought deliberately to run about collecting false views and then affirm them so that I wouldn't think "my views" were the "right ones." What conceivable advantage would somebody gain from assuming that all his views were wrong? Yeah, I know. I chuckled too.

The longer version, I took a bit more seriously. It notes that so many people out there have it wrong (given my views), that it asks, how do you know that you aren't just one more of "them," the sincere and well-intentioned guy who gets it wrong? This is worth asking.

The problems with this question (used as an objection) may be listed thus. First, it assumes that "no one really has the answer and knows that they do with certainty." It veils a form of agnosticism that refutes itself. In other words, when someone implies or affirms explictly that no one can know ultimate truths for sure, he has uttered an example of an ultimate truth, one which implies ITS OWN denial.

Second, notice that the challenger holds to his view (agnosticism) just the way, let us say a Christian (or any other sort of proponent), holds to his views. The agnostic does just what he chides the Christian for: "Supposing that HIS views are the right ones." Agnostics seems no less confident than Christians when they offer rebuttals. Here, you can find the Achilles heel any astute apologist is looking for. Sweep the legs.

Third, this challenge attempts to employ the wide variety of choices out there as some sort of insurmountable obstacle to finding the best choice. This offspring of the agnostic thesis normally carries the daunting label "epistemological pluralism." By way of example, this would amount to arguing that a lottery winner could not know he had won the lottery if all the confused losers in the lottery also claimed to have won it. Now, I do not recommend lotteries, or any other form of gambling. But if I did, I would at least want to check the numbers on the ticket to see if I had won. This would solve the above problem.

Moreover, if we grant the challenger's assumed (but never stated) view that a wide variety of choices prevents us from discovering the Truth, this would then render science (and knowledge in general) impossible. For every field of science, at any given moment, overflows with several or dozens of competing views on this or that event, process or what have you. The same is true of philosophy, math and English. And, remember, the implied conclusion of this mirage, "No knowledge is possible" cannot be known to be true -- on its OWN terms.

What shall we conclude then from our brief study? Agnostic game over. The fact that a wide array of religious or philosophical views dot the landscape does not in any way mitigate against the claim (or likelihood) that a person can know the truth about such topics, and know that he knows such truth, even while others confidently get it wrong. The existence of counterfeit dollars does not disprove the genuine greenback. We know this for sure because the contrary is logically impossible. Smoke'm if ya gottem.

Carson Day has written some 1.3 gazillion articles and essays aimed at helping other live wisely and well. He studied the history of ideas in college, and believes a great many propositions on purpose. Feeling courageous? You can visit his websites at http://ophirgold.blogspot.com (The Omniblog) and http://extremeprofit.blogspot.com (Carson's Day Trading Outpost)

Article source: Expert Articles

Most Recent Articles in Philosophy category

  • What is Creation? - By: Stacey T Pollock
    A personal perception of creation.
  • History of Kabbalah: Rabash - Baal HaSulam's Son and Successor - By: Bnei Baruch
    Rabash (1906 - 1991) was the last great Kabbalist to attain the spiritual world individually. In our times only a group of people can do this, and Rabash's books are indispensable guides for one who develops spiritually today.
  • Passion for my Nation “Nepal” - By: Kshitize Agrawal
    These voices and these songs of the Nepalese people altogether seem to re- quicken the cosmic pulsation.
  • An Amazing, Hazy Look Into The Future - By: Geoff Howard
    Sometimes we all sit and think. Sometimes we doodle with a pen. Do we ever look in depth at what we are thinking?
  • Simple Words - By: Julie Pierce
    The words, the thoughts, the processes go on and on.As simple as it may seem to me I tend to feel that all words have their own meaning and not always the dictionary form.A simple word takes the form of many other words as each individual person who hears it puts it through a transformation process.
  • Raindrops Keep Falling On My Web - By: Sandeep Tiwari
    I really believe there are things nobody would see if I didn't photograph them. The probability of that obviously is very low but laws of probability have often been known to falter at the crucial test of reality. For example, there is a statistical theory that if you gave a million monkeys typewriters and set them to work, they’d eventually comes up with the complete works of Shakespeare.
  • What Is Destiny? Is There Some Thing Called Free Will? - By: Ashok Kumar Gupta
    One of the greatest and everlasting debates of humanity has been about the role of destiny in the lives of human beings. There was a time when it was almost an accepted fact of life that each and every event was governed by destiny of human beings. Astrology was considered a science.
  • Culture and Knowledge - By: Lance Winslow
    In eastern Cultures the passing of thought was considered valuable, so much in fact that even to this day members of those cultures respect their elders and listen to their advice. The passing of such thoughts and concepts and philosophies is of extreme value. The Christianity religion and its followers take those stories in the bible literally, almost to an absolute truth.
  • Desire is the First Step - By: Lance Winslow
    When a member of a species determines it wants something a thought is born, which triggers a desire and thus starts the brain into a cycle innovation and strategy. If it is hunger in a Bald Eagle it means flying over the river to catch a Salmon. If it is a tourist who is cold it means going in and buying a sweatshirt.
  • DNA, Fiction and Society; How it Affects Thought - By: Lance Winslow
    A book called the Seven Daughters of Eve by Richard Sykes is worthy of a read and talks about what we have learned about the flow of human beings populations through DNA research. Thus it is safe to say that certain members of our species have developed differently and in different ways, meaning the brain also learns differently. As Scientists look at different human brains while doing various tasks and watch which areas light up with energy as it works through these different thoughts and tasks we are finding just how unique and different each mind really is.