DNA Fingerprinting and Paternity Testing

By: Peter Wood
Submitted: 2008-04-30 00:20:33
Print this article | Tell a friend | For publisher | Social Bookmarking
Rating:
 

In 1984 a discovery was made that highlighted the power of DNA as an indispensible tool for human identity and relationship testing. The technique - The DNA Fingerprint - was developed by Professor Sir Alec Jeffreys of Leicester University. As with conventional fingerprints, where various loops and ridges are compared between individuals, DNA testing relies on comparing certain DNA features called DNA markers between two (or more) DNA samples and studying similarities between them.

The very first case that utilised DNA fingerprinting was Sarba Vs the Home Office, 1985, an immigration case where it was necessary to prove the direct biological relationship between Christianna Sarba and her son Andrew. By comparing Christianna’s DNA sample against that of Andrew’s and his three legally recognised siblings, a direct biological relationship was shown beyond a doubt.

Over the years DNA technology has progressed, and now modern techniques are so powerful that a profile can be created from a minute skin flake, a single hair or from an item handled by a person and then compared against another individual or database.

DNA fingerprinting has become routinely used for both criminal and non-criminal cases, with the aim of either establishing a match between a crime scene sample and a suspect or establishing a biological relationship between two or more individuals, the most common relationship being Paternity. With regard to a DNA paternity test, every child inherits half of its DNA from each parent i.e. 23 chromosomes from the mother and 23 from the father, this being the reason why there are two sets of alleles for each person.

Because biology is a weird and wonderful science, the inheritance patterns of the markers used do not have to correspond identically with one set/column of alleles from each parent, but rather be a combination of the two alleles of each parent. If the fathers held the a and B alleles for a particular gene and the mother C and D, the child could inherit A and C, A and D, B and C or B and D alleles.

As standard we test a system of 16 genetic markers, which is more than sufficient to establish a 99.99% inclusion probability (where the alleged father is actually the father) or a 100% exclusion probability (where the alleged father is not the father).

If there is suspicion that the alleged father could be one of two relatives (e.g. brothers) we can perform a more extensive test, looking at a greater number of markers to further differentiate between the putative fathers. The only instance where we would not be able to differentiate between individuals is if they were identical twins.
The need to perform a complex DNA relationship test arises most often in matters of child support and child custody or for immigration purposes, when:

  • A child's alleged father is unavailable but his immediate relatives are available for testing; or
  • Both the biological parents of the child are deceased or missing and a biological relative wishes to apply for custody of the child.

Since a child inherits half its DNA from each of its biological parents, we can trace certain markers to relatives of the biological parents, to determine if they contributed DNA to the child's genetic profile (presumably through the missing or deceased alleged parent or parents.)

Peter Wood is Business Development Manager of Eurofins Genetic Services, which offers two types of DNA paternity test - 'peace of mind' home paternity tests for those seeking perosnal reassurance about their familial relationships and legal paternity tests for criminal, civil and immigration cases.

Article source: Expert Articles

Most Recent Articles in Science category

  • Hydrogen As a Fuel Source - By: Levi Quinn
    From water to air, there are a number of ways to energize your car. Alternatives to petroleum are a hot topic today. The growing concern for the environment is steadily increasing. It's an important issue that many people want to feel personally connected to. Hydrogen as a fuel source is not an entirely new idea. But science is taking a closer look at the impact that using hydrogen could have on both the environment and the economy. The best solutions are the ones that have more benefits than drawbacks.
  • MRI and Ultrasound: Two Vital Branches of Radiology - By: R Govindan
    Radiology was initially the branch of medical imaging that made use of x-rays on large flat sheets of photographic films for diagnosis. Modern day radiology is no longer confined to the practice of x-rays and now encompasses other methods of diagnostic imaging such as Computed Tomography (CT), Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Ultrasound.
  • Processes Involved In Blavatsky's Writings and its effects - By: Edi Bilimoria
    Helena Petrovna Blavatsky (HPB) demonstrated the Siddhis (psychic-spiritual faculties) of clairvoyance, clairaudience, and the powers of projection, precipitation and being en rapport. These were all used in her writings on Occult science and Meta Physics which may be categorized into seven kinds of processes. We outline them below but it is emphasized that none of the above processes are miracles or supernatural
  • Biotech Development - By: Marcia Henin
    The development of Biotechnology and the affect it has in detecting Toxicity levels in the Human body.
  • Nanotechnology - Revolution in the Field of Medicine - By: Marcia Henin
    How science has learned to use Nanotechnology for bettering the process of Drug development.
  • Nanotechnology - Development in Water-Based Technology - By: Marcia Henin
    What is Nanotechnology and how does it applies in the science world - In this article, we will review some of the uses of Nanotechnology and its connection to the solubilization process.
  • The Z-Boson Mass and its Formula as Multiple Proofs in One Bowl of Yummy Pudding - By: Sean Sheeter
    A demonstration of the mathematical, theoretical and, especially, empirical connotations of the phrase "Pudding Proof" in the context of a highly exacting physical model. In particular, a formula is given deriving the mass of the Z-boson from two heavy quarks and and Higgs field. Remarkably, the precise correlation with the known value of the Z-mass is thus empirically proof positive of these far less directly measurable masses, which is further supported by arithmetic and theoretic construct.
  • The Theory, Significance and Precise Calculation of Gluino Mass - By: Sean Sheeter
    A preview of the most significant predictable particle cascades at Cern's LH-Collider in the coming years. Describes how a precise gluino mass of 6.388355 TeV relates to the super-symmetric Higgs mechanism and decays to squarks and other 'sparticles as a prerequisite to creation of 'dark mass,' as well as the unsolved puzzle of material baryon creation. Which also goes on to shows why giving three dimensionless calculations for the gluino mass are central to the e-course "241-Mumbers."
  • Derivation of the Pure Precise Fine-Structure Number and as a Ratio of Two Inexact Metric Constants - By: Sean Sheeter
    A history of a definitive answer to #1 'millennium question' of Strings 2000 in regard to whether all fundamental parameters can be determined in a dimensionless manner. Focus's on a 'pure' calculation of the fine-structure constant from a unified 'monolithic' system that allows precise equations for the full spectrum of fundamental particle masses from Higgs/SUSY to quarks, neutrinos and dark matter. With an update on controversies of determining the fine-structure from metric measures and a few other related issues.
  • Proof of the Exact Up and Down Quark Masses from the Pion Mass-Differential - By: Sean Sheeter
    A discussion of the equivalence of the mass differential between the charged and neutral pion as a function the mass difference between the down and up quark. Given the unprecedented mass value of the down quark = 7.763258 MeV, the up quark mass is calculable from the even more exacting d-u mass differential = 4.593453 MeV, where the experimental pion mass difference = 4.5936 plusmn.0005 MeV.