Spooky Time

By: Lindsey Williams
Submitted: 2007-01-17 16:26:59
Print this article | Tell a friend | For publisher | Social Bookmarking
Rating:
 

News from the scientific world tell us that there is a “warp” in the universe whereby the speed of light, and the passage of time, are so strangely related that the mere act of measuring them alters their performance.

Einstein spent his life trying to find the “quantum mechanics” of nature whereby moving clocks run slower, and light travels faster, when we watch them. He called the phenomena “spooky action at a distance.”

The great theoretician expressed the relationship in his famous “special theory of relativity” formula: E=MC2 – Energy equals Mass, times the C-speed of light, squared.

Neither he, nor scientists since, have determined the “general theory of relativity” that would explain the relationship between light, time, gravity, electricity and magnetism.

The theory of relativity was proven by a simple experiment. Three atomic clocks fitted with short-wave radio switches were calibrated precisely the same. One was put aboard a jet plane. The other two were placed on the ground along the plane’s flight path. A signal station was located midway between the ground clocks.

All clocks were started by signal when the plane was at full speed. All were turned off three hours later. Upon examination, the airborne clock was found to have marked off less time than the stationary clocks. A Limerick reflects the anomaly:

There once was a lady named Bright

Whose speed was faster than light.

She traveled one day

In a relative way

And returned on the previous night.

Einstein equated time to a ”fourth dimension” -- corollary to the three dimensions of the everyday world of length, width and depth. Some scholars theorize there may be additional dimensions. Comprehending them is daunting.

One scientist comfortable with the new mechanics is Thomas Banchoff, chairman of Brown University mathematics department in 1985. He used his computer to create two-dimension “shadows” of four-dimension objects.

A four-dimension universe may be a twin of ours – perhaps impossible to see and certainly difficult for most of us to comprehend.

Banchoff told the Christian Science Monitor – one of the nation’s leading newspapers specializing in science information – that he was inspired by an 1884 novel titled “Flatland” by Edwin Abbott.

“The book depicts a world of 2-D creatures who won’t accept the idea of another dimension, even though they’re visited by a Sphere from a 3-D world.

“A Square, returns the visit to the third dimension and sees what theretofore was unimagined. He suggests to his spherical friend that maybe there is even a fourth dimension. The Sphere scoffs.

“The Square returns to his 2-D world and tells friends of his journey. They jail him for heresy.”

Dr. Banchoff describes his computerized 4-D depictions as analogous to casting on a wall the shadow of your hand.

“To a flat 2-D creature on the wall surface, the shadow of your 3-D hand would be mysterious. It would change shape – growing fatter or thinner, as you turn your hand.

“If you move your hand out of the light, it would disappear altogether. In reality, of course, it only appears to do so for 2-D creatures.

“Similarly, a four-dimensional creature invading our world would presumably appear just as odd – contorting, turning inside out, appearing and disappearing.”

* * *

The bond between time and light is little understood. Several decades before Einstein, Thomas Young fired a light beam of photons through two slits in a screen. Through the process of “interference” of light rays with each other, this projected a series of light strips.

When Young sent photons to the screen one at a time -- and measured which slit they went through -- the interference stripes became just a bright spot. Having knowledge of what slit each photon went through, apparently altered the mechanics of light.

In a recent experiment, Raymond Ciao and associates of the University of California at Berkeley seemingly got light to travel faster than 186,000 mps.

The Berkeley team fired particles of light toward a detector. Half were sent through the air. The other particles were directed to a glass mirror en route.

All but one percent of the focused particles bounced off the mirror and was lost. However, the surviving one percent tunneled through the mirror and hit the detector 70 percent quicker than the unimpeded particles.

Ciao calls his results an “illusion.” But he can’t explain it. “One implication,” he says, “is that you can affect the past.”

There is something occult, magic, about these phenomena. Simply measuring time and light seems to affect their performance. This raises a profound question: does human consciousness have an impact on the universe?

* * *

In seeking answers to relativity, cosmologists have overturned the long-held belief that light travels at a rate of 186,000 miles per second, and nothing else in the universe exceeds that. Now we know that speed is relative to the observer.

If Einstein’s conclusion that the universe is warped – curved, saddle-shaped, turned back on itself -- then light speed will vary as it traverses peaks and valleys of space.

A curved space suggests that an astronomer looking into the cosmos, with a powerful enough telescope, would be able to see the back of his head.

The speed of light is affected by gravitational attraction of stars as it passes near by. Einstein’s supposition -- that light can bend -- has been well proven by observations of our Sun during an eclipse.

A curved universe suggests that a rocket craft could reach point X on a space journey faster by cutting across a circle rather than “directly” around its perimeter. Astronomers have discovered “wormholes,” spaces between heavenly bodies along which light moves more rapidly than elsewhere.

That which goes up, must come down. Or, to state it another way, that which speeds up must slow down. Interstellar space travel may be more feasible than we think.

Other properties of the time-light partnership might be exploited. Dr. Lene Hau, of Harvard, has succeeded in slowing the speed of light through ultra-cold gas – abundant in the universe – to 38 miles per hour. He hopes to slow it to 20 miles per hour for wireless super-computers.

* * *

Scientific American magazine two years ago asked Prof. Gary T. Horowitz, physicist at the University of California at Santa Barbara, if it was possible for a human being within one lifetime to travel into the distant future, or past? His answers were (1) “Definitely yes” and (2) ”Maybe.”

“If we were to depart from Earth in a spaceship that could accelerate continuously at a comfortable one-times-gravity, we would begin to approach the speed of light in about a year. Clocks, and people, aboard the ship would progress at an ever-slower rate relative to the earth.

“Under such circumstances, a round trip to the center of our galaxy and back to Earth – a distance of some 60,000 light-years – could be completed in only a little more that 40 years of ship time.

“Upon arriving back a Earth, astronauts would be only 40 years older, while 60,000 years would have passed on Earth.

“Time travel into the past is much more uncertain. There are many solutions to Einstein’s equation of General Relativity that allow a person to follow a timeline that would result in someone encountering his/her self – or deceased grandparents – at an earlier time.”

Horowitz points out that no experiment or observation has ever indicated that time travel is occurring in our universe. Theoretically, however, one could place a time machine at the mouth of a wormhole and give it a good push. Passage through the wormhole would then would allow travel to the past of the universe – not to our personal lives on Earth.

Now that everyone understands everything about time, all we have to figure out is where God was standing when He/She created heaven and earth.

“Beam me up, Scotty. There is no intelligent life here.”

February 18, 2001

Click here to see this article on Lindsey Williams's website

Lindsey Williams is a Sun columnist who can be contacted at:

LinWms@earthlink.net

LinWms@lindseywilliams.org

Website: http://www.lindseywilliams.org with several hundred of Lin's Editorial & At Large articles written over 40 years.

Also featured in its entirety is Lin's groundbreaking book "Boldly Onward," that critically analyzes and develops theories about the original Spanish explorers of America. (fully indexed/searchable)

Article source: Expert Articles

Most Recent Articles in Science category

  • Hydrogen As a Fuel Source - By: Levi Quinn
    From water to air, there are a number of ways to energize your car. Alternatives to petroleum are a hot topic today. The growing concern for the environment is steadily increasing. It's an important issue that many people want to feel personally connected to. Hydrogen as a fuel source is not an entirely new idea. But science is taking a closer look at the impact that using hydrogen could have on both the environment and the economy. The best solutions are the ones that have more benefits than drawbacks.
  • MRI and Ultrasound: Two Vital Branches of Radiology - By: R Govindan
    Radiology was initially the branch of medical imaging that made use of x-rays on large flat sheets of photographic films for diagnosis. Modern day radiology is no longer confined to the practice of x-rays and now encompasses other methods of diagnostic imaging such as Computed Tomography (CT), Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Ultrasound.
  • Processes Involved In Blavatsky's Writings and its effects - By: Edi Bilimoria
    Helena Petrovna Blavatsky (HPB) demonstrated the Siddhis (psychic-spiritual faculties) of clairvoyance, clairaudience, and the powers of projection, precipitation and being en rapport. These were all used in her writings on Occult science and Meta Physics which may be categorized into seven kinds of processes. We outline them below but it is emphasized that none of the above processes are miracles or supernatural
  • Biotech Development - By: Marcia Henin
    The development of Biotechnology and the affect it has in detecting Toxicity levels in the Human body.
  • Nanotechnology - Revolution in the Field of Medicine - By: Marcia Henin
    How science has learned to use Nanotechnology for bettering the process of Drug development.
  • Nanotechnology - Development in Water-Based Technology - By: Marcia Henin
    What is Nanotechnology and how does it applies in the science world - In this article, we will review some of the uses of Nanotechnology and its connection to the solubilization process.
  • The Z-Boson Mass and its Formula as Multiple Proofs in One Bowl of Yummy Pudding - By: Sean Sheeter
    A demonstration of the mathematical, theoretical and, especially, empirical connotations of the phrase "Pudding Proof" in the context of a highly exacting physical model. In particular, a formula is given deriving the mass of the Z-boson from two heavy quarks and and Higgs field. Remarkably, the precise correlation with the known value of the Z-mass is thus empirically proof positive of these far less directly measurable masses, which is further supported by arithmetic and theoretic construct.
  • The Theory, Significance and Precise Calculation of Gluino Mass - By: Sean Sheeter
    A preview of the most significant predictable particle cascades at Cern's LH-Collider in the coming years. Describes how a precise gluino mass of 6.388355 TeV relates to the super-symmetric Higgs mechanism and decays to squarks and other 'sparticles as a prerequisite to creation of 'dark mass,' as well as the unsolved puzzle of material baryon creation. Which also goes on to shows why giving three dimensionless calculations for the gluino mass are central to the e-course "241-Mumbers."
  • Derivation of the Pure Precise Fine-Structure Number and as a Ratio of Two Inexact Metric Constants - By: Sean Sheeter
    A history of a definitive answer to #1 'millennium question' of Strings 2000 in regard to whether all fundamental parameters can be determined in a dimensionless manner. Focus's on a 'pure' calculation of the fine-structure constant from a unified 'monolithic' system that allows precise equations for the full spectrum of fundamental particle masses from Higgs/SUSY to quarks, neutrinos and dark matter. With an update on controversies of determining the fine-structure from metric measures and a few other related issues.
  • Proof of the Exact Up and Down Quark Masses from the Pion Mass-Differential - By: Sean Sheeter
    A discussion of the equivalence of the mass differential between the charged and neutral pion as a function the mass difference between the down and up quark. Given the unprecedented mass value of the down quark = 7.763258 MeV, the up quark mass is calculable from the even more exacting d-u mass differential = 4.593453 MeV, where the experimental pion mass difference = 4.5936 plusmn.0005 MeV.