Categories
- Arts & Entertainment
- Business
- Communications
- Computers
- Culture & Society
- Disease & Illness
- Fashion
- Finance
- Food & Beverage
- Health & Fitness
- Hobbies
- Home & Family
- Home Based Business
- Internet Business
- Legal
- Pets & Animals
- Politics
- Product Reviews
- Recreation & Sports
- Reference & Education
- Religion
- Self Improvement
- Shopping
- Travel & Leisure
- Vehicles
- Writing & Speaking
Information
The Chronosphere - Revealing the Nature of Time
Submitted: 2007-01-17 16:26:59
Print this article | Tell a friend | For publisher |
The conventional view of physical life is linear. By "linear", I mean the concept that the lives we live can be described in terms of a progression beginning at birth, through the past to the present, then to the future and ending at death. This is often referred to as a "timeline". The model for this is a line where "now" is a point on the line, the part of the line "behind" now is the past, and the part of the line in "front" of now is the future. In this essay I will introduce you to a radically different viewpoint, in which "now" is actually the center of a sphere, with an infinity of available "pasts" and "futures" comprising the body of the sphere itself.
To prepare yourself for this new understanding, you need to set aside the linear concept of life and time and, instead, consider that life and time are simultaneous. What this means is that past and future do not exist in the way we have been taught to understand them and, furthermore, that what we are accustomed to calling "past" and "future" are essentially the same. All that actually exists is "the now", or Moment, and that is the whole of it. The following exercise will help you in making this radical shift.
First, imagine an individual physical life experience as represented by a finite line starting at a beginning called birth, progressing to a point called "now", and continuing until an end called death. Next, imagine escaping this line and viewing it from an external, non-dimensional perspective. From this extra-dimensional vantage point, the entire line representing the life lived up to the now point can be seen, but in addition is seen what could be described as an infinite three-dimensional array of alternate lines on the "future" side of now, all converging at the now point. This array represents all the alternate future timelines that can be lived. A similar infinite three dimensional array of alternate lines on the "past" side of now is also converging at the now point, and amongst that array is the past timeline remembered as having been lived. Note that this "past" array does not consist of the timelines other people have lived, but in fact are the alternate timelines not remembered as having been lived by the individual in question.
Thus, the now point represents the center of a chronosphere consisting of an infinity of timelines. These timelines radiate from the center to the chronosphere surface, like an infinite porcupine ball. We have divided this chronosphere arbitrarily and conceptually into two hemispheres, one of which we call the "past" hemisphere and the other of which we call the "future" hemisphere. Unlike the Earth's hemispheres, which are separated into north and south by a line called the equator, the hemispheres of the chronosphere are separated by a conceptualized plane that runs perpendicular to any given timeline and bisects the sphere at the now point. However, from our non-dimensional vantage point "past" and "future" are not perceived as separated in this manner, contrary to the arbitrary conceptual division we have made within our dimensional perception. This chronosphere of all pasts and futures is actually One. As part of the essence of the chronosphere, the dimension of time itself is recognized as nonlinear and is measured at right angles to all timelines. By contrast, change over time, which is measured along dimensions other than time, runs congruent with any given timeline.<
These timelines are not separate, discrete lines; all of them intersect many others at various points as they are measured from the center to the surface of the sphere. The direction you take in life, therefore, is far from being a straight line. It can have many curves, twists, turns, and sharp angles to it when compared to a straight line measured from a point on the sphere surface, through the now point, and onto a point on the opposite side of the sphere. Additionally, there is no limit to the directions a timeline can take, meaning that a line can swerve into what I've called the future direction, then abruptly double back into what I've called the past, then turn at right angles to the past and future, then back to the future again, and so forth. One implication of this is the possibility for us to have a memory of the future in much the same way as we can remember the past. You see the necessity of discarding the linear approach to life in order to grasp this concept!
Any difficulty you might be experiencing with grasping this is rooted in the idea that there exists an absolute fixed past that is "over" and a future that has not yet happened, but still able to be known by someone sufficiently clairvoyant. The truth is that when your timeline takes a turn into the "past", it is not a voyage into a fixed past, but means, simply, that you are experiencing in a direction greater than 90 degrees away relative to your previous direction. These degrees are measured along the actual time dimension, not along a timeline. Timelines are measured along the dimensions that define change over time, and not along the actual time dimension. Using the chronosphere model, the degrees are measured along the surface of the chronosphere, and must be relative to a starting, or reference, point. For example, a 180 degree shift would direct you at a point opposite your reference point, or at a point on the other side of the chronosphere relative to your reference point. Therefore, if your starting point was what you call moving towards the future, then by simple logic your new position is moving towards the past!
With the chronosphere structure in mind, does an absolute past exist? While this is a common belief, in truth all we have is memories. Our individual past memories are only our past, not THE past. Ask each of two people who were present at the same event to tell you what really happened. You will find that you cannot get an absolute answer because details will differ in the two accounts. Add to this recognition the knowledge that a vividly imagined event can have the same impact on us as a so-called real event, and the answer to the question of how to define the past becomes even more elusive. Our experience in the now and the artifacts we possess are of doubtful help, because we interpret our perceptions according to our beliefs. If we believe a certain set of experiences is our past, then we will interpret our present and artifacts in light of those beliefs. This observation is one of the reasons why determining or keeping accurate records of historical events is such a challenge. The question that should be asked concerns whether it makes any difference what the so-called real past is. The bottom line here is that the concept of an absolute past is a red herring and is not the issue; how we process the energetic involved in whatever experience we hold in mind is the true issue. The exercise of assigning measurements to experience, such as "this thing happened to me 10 years ago, and it's still painful" is an example of the dimensionalizing of experience, and all this accomplishes is to make life experience more complex and refractory to resolution.
Within this new understanding is the key to coping with, or processing, life experience. For example, if we know that we can watch a movie depicting some horrific event and yet be able to assimilate and even enjoy the movie experience, we have the mechanism in place to cope with traumatic events in our lives. The internal processing involved is exactly the same in both instances; the only reason we do not realize this as a matter of course is because of our beliefs. Beliefs are conditions we have adopted and set within ourselves; these conditions limit our ability to respond constructively to life experience. In this context, "constructively" means any response that indicates greater awareness and unconditional acceptance of life experience.
While the chronosphere model, as described in this essay, is a radical departure from the linear time concept we are all familiar with, I will take it even further and state that Reality is that the chronosphere is not merely an assemblage of a great many timelines. The chronosphere is actually solid with every possibility being as real as any possibility. The now point is not merely the center, but comprises the entire chronosphere! Time is thus shown to be both infinite and nonexistent simultaneously and the now point is shown to be none other than the Infinite Point, both the center of All, and All; dimensionless and yet of Infinite Dimension. This is in keeping with the enlightened understanding that now is all there is, and that All is One.
LariAnn Garner has sought knowledge of the meaning of life since her teenage years, and lives that quest today. This quest has led her through exploration of different versions of Christianity as well as studies as wide-ranging as the Edgar Cayce material, Lobsang Rampa, the work of Robert A. Monroe and the Monroe Institute, the Bartholomew material, Ramana Maharshi, and much more. Her first published book is Fractalic Awakening - A Seeker's Guide, available at fractalicawakening.com She lives with her family in south Florida, U.S.A. |
Article source: Expert Articles
Most Recent Articles in Science category
- Hydrogen As a Fuel Source - By: Levi Quinn
From water to air, there are a number of ways to energize your car. Alternatives to petroleum are a hot topic today. The growing concern for the environment is steadily increasing. It's an important issue that many people want to feel personally connected to. Hydrogen as a fuel source is not an entirely new idea. But science is taking a closer look at the impact that using hydrogen could have on both the environment and the economy. The best solutions are the ones that have more benefits than drawbacks. - MRI and Ultrasound: Two Vital Branches of Radiology - By: R Govindan
Radiology was initially the branch of medical imaging that made use of x-rays on large flat sheets of photographic films for diagnosis. Modern day radiology is no longer confined to the practice of x-rays and now encompasses other methods of diagnostic imaging such as Computed Tomography (CT), Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Ultrasound. - Processes Involved In Blavatsky's Writings and its effects - By: Edi Bilimoria
Helena Petrovna Blavatsky (HPB) demonstrated the Siddhis (psychic-spiritual faculties) of clairvoyance, clairaudience, and the powers of projection, precipitation and being en rapport. These were all used in her writings on Occult science and Meta Physics which may be categorized into seven kinds of processes. We outline them below but it is emphasized that none of the above processes are miracles or supernatural - Biotech Development - By: Marcia Henin
The development of Biotechnology and the affect it has in detecting Toxicity levels in the Human body. - Nanotechnology - Revolution in the Field of Medicine - By: Marcia Henin
How science has learned to use Nanotechnology for bettering the process of Drug development. - Nanotechnology - Development in Water-Based Technology - By: Marcia Henin
What is Nanotechnology and how does it applies in the science world - In this article, we will review some of the uses of Nanotechnology and its connection to the solubilization process. - The Z-Boson Mass and its Formula as Multiple Proofs in One Bowl of Yummy Pudding - By: Sean Sheeter
A demonstration of the mathematical, theoretical and, especially, empirical connotations of the phrase "Pudding Proof" in the context of a highly exacting physical model. In particular, a formula is given deriving the mass of the Z-boson from two heavy quarks and and Higgs field. Remarkably, the precise correlation with the known value of the Z-mass is thus empirically proof positive of these far less directly measurable masses, which is further supported by arithmetic and theoretic construct. - The Theory, Significance and Precise Calculation of Gluino Mass - By: Sean Sheeter
A preview of the most significant predictable particle cascades at Cern's LH-Collider in the coming years. Describes how a precise gluino mass of 6.388355 TeV relates to the super-symmetric Higgs mechanism and decays to squarks and other 'sparticles as a prerequisite to creation of 'dark mass,' as well as the unsolved puzzle of material baryon creation. Which also goes on to shows why giving three dimensionless calculations for the gluino mass are central to the e-course "241-Mumbers." - Derivation of the Pure Precise Fine-Structure Number and as a Ratio of Two Inexact Metric Constants - By: Sean Sheeter
A history of a definitive answer to #1 'millennium question' of Strings 2000 in regard to whether all fundamental parameters can be determined in a dimensionless manner. Focus's on a 'pure' calculation of the fine-structure constant from a unified 'monolithic' system that allows precise equations for the full spectrum of fundamental particle masses from Higgs/SUSY to quarks, neutrinos and dark matter. With an update on controversies of determining the fine-structure from metric measures and a few other related issues. - Proof of the Exact Up and Down Quark Masses from the Pion Mass-Differential - By: Sean Sheeter
A discussion of the equivalence of the mass differential between the charged and neutral pion as a function the mass difference between the down and up quark. Given the unprecedented mass value of the down quark = 7.763258 MeV, the up quark mass is calculable from the even more exacting d-u mass differential = 4.593453 MeV, where the experimental pion mass difference = 4.5936 plusmn.0005 MeV.
